FORD FUSION MODELS COMPARED INSTALL

How Do the Prices on Repair and Maintenance Stack Up?Д«ecause of their luxury vehicle status, Mercurys often have extra parts, increasing the likelihood of something failing and requiring repair. By comparison, Ford sold 1,440,655 units the same year, outselling Mercury 15-to-1. In 2009 (the year before it was discontinued), Mercury sold 92,299 units of its various models. As a result, it only made sense that Ford recorded more sales than Mercury did. In contrast, the middle-class individuals whom Ford vehicles are targeted at are perhaps the largest demographic in the US. Luxury brands like Mercury are mostly popular with upper-class individuals who make up a small part of the American population. That Mercury sold fewer vehicles than Ford isnвЂ™t a surprise. Meanwhile, Ford sales have climbed to astronomical levels, thanks to bestselling models like the F-Series and the Fusion. Later years saw its contributions to Ford Motor Co.вЂ™s total sales drop to a dismal percentage. The Mercury Milan costs $20,320, while the Ford Fusion costs $19,035.Д®ven at the height of MercuryвЂ™s dominance in the 50s and 60s, it never sold as many cars as Ford. Ford Fusion: Even if Ford merely rehashed the Fusion and named it the Milan, the latter still costs more. Features on Grand Mariners e.g., panoramic sunroof and leather seats, are absent on Escapes. Same model-year Escapes are cheaper, coming in at $20, 345. Ford Escape: Base-model 2009 Grand Mariners cost $22,650. The Grand Marquis comes with additional features such as electrochromic mirrors, leather-covered steering wheels, and climate control. ThatвЂ™s $4,000 more than the price of a same-year Taurus ($25,170). Ford Taurus: A new 2010 Mercury Grand Marquis costs $29,525. HereвЂ™s a quick comparison of prices of models from both brands: Fords have always been more affordable, which explains their popularity among average income earners in the US. They come with extra creature comforts that inevitably drive prices up. Mercurys are premium vehicles with an emphasis on passenger comfort and convenience. Having compared reliability on models from each brand, Ford clearlyВ is the more reliable of the two manufacturers. However, it still manages to be less reliable than its sibling, earning a 4/5 Reliability Rating against the FusionвЂ™s perfect 5/5 Reliability Rating. Mercury Milan: The Milan is nothing more than a re-badged Fusion. It earns a 3/5 Reliability Rating compared to the MarinerвЂ™s 2/5 Reliability Rating. JD Power rates the Escape better in terms of reliability. Mercury Mariner: Also SUVs, both models have similar underpinnings. Conversely, the Mercury Mountaineer receives a dismal 2/5 Reliability Rating. JD Power gives the Explorer a 3/5 Reliability Rating. Mercury Mountaineer: Both SUVs, the two share several features. Popular knowledge dictates that more parts/components mean higher chances of something breaking down.Д«elow is a comparison of reliability ratings for some Ford and Mercury models: Mercury cars are more luxurious and have additional features aimed at increasing the comfort of passengers. Ford vehicles are mostly practical cars and feature only essential components. However, a pointer to each modelвЂ™s reliability lies in its design. It is hard to say which brand, Ford or Mercury, is more reliable, given that both models have had their fair share of issues over the years. Which of the Two Is the More Reliable Car Brand? In that same year, Ford sold 1,752,111 units of its various models in the US. By comparison, Fords were mass-market models produced and sold in large quantities.ДЇor example, in 2010, (MercuryвЂ™s last production year), MercuryвЂ™s annual sales totaled 93,915 units. Mercury was no different and usually had low production/sales volume. Luxury vehicles, because of their high price tags, are usually produced and sold in small numbers. Meanwhile, Ford vehicles were cheaper compared to their luxury siblings.

FORD FUSION MODELS COMPARED INSTALL

These features cost more to produce and install hence, prices of the models inevitably increased. While both models share components, Mercurys had additional features designed to increase the comfort of owners. Unsurprisingly, Mercury vehicles are more expensive than Ford. Mercury was a mid-luxury nameplate that was more popular among members of AmericaвЂ™s upper class. Mostly, Ford vehicles were low-priced cars popular among the middle-class and lower-class Americans.ДЇord-badged vehicles were everyday cars that had no special status attached to them. How Is the Performance of the Two Brands Compared?.How Do the Prices on Repair and Maintenance Stack Up?.Which of the Two Is the More Reliable Car Brand?.

Ford fusion models compared